@article{GPM11554,
author = {Febe Elsayghe and Hira B. Khan and Mehwash Nadeem},
title = {The pelvic floor: myth or hype?—a narrative review},
journal = {Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine},
volume = {0},
number = {0},
year = {2026},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background and Objective: The pelvic floor represents a complex, dynamic neuromuscular structure integral to urinary, bowel, and sexual function. Despite its fundamental role, pelvic floor dysfunction remains under-recognised in both diagnosis and management within urology and gynaecology. Traditional perspectives have often confined its clinical relevance to stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overlooking its contribution to voiding dysfunction, chronic pelvic pain (CPP), sexual dysfunction (SD), and functional bladder outlet obstruction (FBOO). This narrative review aims to examine the pelvic floor as a central determinant of functional pelvic health rather than an adjunctive consideration.Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and Elsevier platforms, supplemented by targeted searches of national clinical guideline repositories, including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Searches incorporated Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free text terms related to pelvic floor dysfunction, pelvic floor muscle training, chronic pelvic pain, voiding dysfunction, sexual dysfunction and neuromodulatory therapies. English language studies involving adult populations published between January 1st 1998 and 31st December 2025 were included to capture up-to-date trends. Eligible sources included systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, observational studies and clinical guidelines. A formal risk of bias assessment was not undertaken due to the narrative design.Key content and findings: Evidence demonstrates both hypotonic and hypertonic pelvic floor states are clinically significant. Pelvic floor muscle hypertonicity is strongly associated with CPP, dysfunctional voiding and dyspareunia, while reduced pelvic strength contributes to incontinence and prolapse. High-quality evidence supports supervised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), with or without adjuncts such as biofeedback for managing postpartum SUI. Emerging data support relaxation-based pelvic floor rehabilitation and neuromodulatory interventions.Conclusions: The “phantom floor” is neither myth nor a clinical afterthought but a vital foundation of female pelvic health. Standardised functional assessment pathways, multidisciplinary approach and targeted therapy are the cornerstone for appropriate management of pelvic floor dysfunctions.},
issn = {2617-4499}, url = {https://gpm.amegroups.org/article/view/11554}
}